Labor Blog

    Mr Abbott's education black hole

    Labor HQ posted Thursday, 19 August 2010

    One of Mr Abbott’s centrepiece policies – the Education Tax Refund – has blown a $377 million black hole in the Coalition’s budget.

    With just one proposal, Tony Abbott has shown he lacks the judgement to run Australia’s $1.3 trillion economy.

    Don’t take Federal Labor’s word for it though; this is the independent analysis from the National Centre for Social and Economic Modelling (NATSEM), the same modeller who Tony Abbott recently called the “most reputable and authoritative modelling organisation in Australia”.

    NATSEM has found this single Coalition policy would cost at least $1.14 billion, which is double the $760 million Mr Abbott has budgeted for.

    In part, this problem stems from the Coalition’s refusal to submit their costings to the Departments of Treasury and Finance.  If the Coalition had complied with the Charter of Budget Honesty, the Australian people would have known the real cost.

    Through its refusal to participate in the independent Charter of Budget Honesty process, the Coalition clearly had something to hide. 

    This substantial black hole shows Mr Abbott’s lack of judgement poses a serious risk to the Budget and to the economy.

    The clear message from such an elementary mistake is don’t risk your family’s future with Tony Abbott. 

    In contrast, Federal Labor has outlined real plans to make a difference for Australian families, through providing support for families with teenagers and trying to encourage more apprentices through support during  their training.

    Federal Labor’s policies are fully costed and we will bring the Budget back to surplus in 2013, three years early. 

    Please join the discussion below – do you think Mr Abbott should submit his policies for costing from the Departments of Finance and Treasury?
     

    Tags: Abbott, costing, costings, education, ETR, refund, tax

2 Comments

  • hurtling from North Perth , WA Thursday, 19 August 2010, 21:19

    a Ranga... or a Wingnut. An acute intelligence... or an athletic immaturity. A proven negiator... or a pious naysayer. A national curriculum or a curriculum for nationalists. Nurture... or negativity. Tried... or try hard. A Julia... or a joke. A Gillard... or a gimmick. The choice is clear.

  • sangerer from Albert Park , Victoria Thursday, 19 August 2010, 16:19

    I am not worried about Abbott’s budget black holes because it is not the Liberal Party's intention to honour any election commitments anyway. If the Liberals win, Abbott will do what Howard did and claim that the national accounts are in shambles and that they will have to introduce austerity measures. A post election mini budget will wipe the election slate clean and the liberals will begin their ideologically driven education policy. This will include the poorly framed initiative of delivering greater power to principals and school boards which will do nothing to raise the quality of education. What it will do is put people who have spent their entire life in a sheltered workshop in charge of a school. These people will have the authority to run it as a business. Since 80% + of all principals employed in state schools have no professional business management, project management, IT management, HR management, Facilities management, or even Curriculum management experience, any direct school funding proposal will actually drive marginally performing schools into the education QA abyss . The lowest performing schools that are located in the most disadvantaged areas of Australia serving the most disadvantage clients will become education ghettos. A school funding model on student numbers, school size or any similar blunt model that makes no allowances for school disadvantage type will marginalize these schools and penalize the communities these schools are serving. What is problematic is that Labour seems to skirt a similar nonsense view with the difference being a targeted priority spending approach that addresses key elements of need without outlining the policy steps that need to be taken for their proper implementation. Key areas of staff training, professional language, disability, welfare and counselling support are severely underestimated in Labours plans. These areas are simply not even considered by the Liberals. It is important to consider similar Centres such as the Mental Health Head Space Centres for young people that are struggling for a variety of reasons in the public education system. Teachers are simply not qualified and in many cases not even properly insured, or covered by professional support bodies to provide the services that are essentially extra-educational social & welfare support services. The Labour education policy needs a lot of work before the broad brush stoke election announcements are implementation ready. They require the policy advisory input of people who have had years of education experience at all levels of education. Relying in ivory tower academics and the so called self appointed experts will simply not do. It will not do at all! But alas, it seems that this will be the way Labour will head, if it wins. When will the Labour policy advisors and THink Tank actualkly begin to take notice????? Will it take another policy implementation mess????