Labor Blog

    Mr Abbott's true colours when it comes to education

    Simon Crean posted Thursday, 19 August 2010

    Two days before Australia votes, Tony Abbott has shown his true colours. 

    In an effort to try to prove he can bring the Budget back into surplus, Mr Abbott has admitted that a Coalition Government would unleash round after round of savage cuts to education in Australia.

    He was hoping no one would notice this close to an election, but this is a signpost of what is to come if Tony Abbott becomes Prime Minister.

    The cuts are aimed where Australia can least afford it:  at our apprentices, our most disadvantaged schools, and our disadvantaged students trying to access university.

    How did Mr Abbott do it?

    Firstly, he ripped almost $1 billion from apprenticeship training programs. When combined with cuts he has already announced, this would abolish 461,000 places for apprentices, trainees and other workers trying to build their skills to get and keep a good job. 

    It would also mean more than 80,000 people who are currently in training, apprenticeships and traineeships will have public funding for their training cut part way through.

    Tony Abbott didn’t stop at apprentices though – he also ripped $330 million from the Smarter Schools National Partnership for the most disadvantaged schools in Australia.

    This is the equivalent of almost 1000 teachers per year and will mean reduced funding for 1,270 government, 181 Catholic and 91 Independent schools.

    Our disadvantaged schools need more help, not less help.

    That’s why Federal Labor is going to reward schools that deliver the greatest improvements across a number of different areas and reward our hardworking teachers

    Mr Abbott is also cutting $227 million in funding to support students from disadvantaged backgrounds accessing university.  This cut to universities will hit over 200,000 students each year from disadvantaged backgrounds – denying support for them to go to uni.

    Federal Labor, meanwhile, has a goal to create a higher education system that allows more students from across the community to achieve a higher education qualification.

    For example, in 2012 a re-elected Gillard Labor Government will fund a place for every student who is accepted into a public university.

    Preliminary estimates show that there will be up to a 7.5 per cent increase in Commonwealth-supported places across the sector in 2010 – a potential increase of 45,000 full time equivalent students since 2008.

    Federal Labor is also going to provide more income support for students.  All students on Youth Allowance who do not already receive an existing Federal scholarship will receive $1,300 this year, paid in two instalments of $650.

    Unlike Tony Abbott, Federal Labor wants to support our apprentices and make sure they have the skills needed to get a good job.

    Australia needs more skilled workers. A skilled workforce is more productive, and this puts less pressure on inflation and helps our economy grow.

    Such savage cuts to support for the country’s apprentices shows how reckless Mr Abbott is with the

    In his desperate attempts to show he won’t blow the budget, Mr Abbott has made it clear that he’ll cut the services hard working Australians rely on.

    Don’t risk your family’s future, or Australia’s, with Mr Abbott.

    Join the discussion below – what would Mr Abbott’s cuts to vital education services mean to you and your family? 
     

    Tags: Abbott, Crean, cuts, education

5 Comments

  • Thursday, 9 December 2010, 06:09

    I would like to be a honey bee, they are so unworried and hard-working likewise an author of it. I was not so quiet when long distance movers fooled me

  • Arbee25 from Jerrabomberra , NSW Saturday, 28 August 2010, 10:28

    And as for the $8000 dollar bonus for high performing teachers - I would have to share it with every teacher who had had my students, or had contact with my students, or who worked with me in the many committees, reviews and trials we take part in to improve our educational practise. Teaching is a COLLEGIATE profession. The promise of an $8000 bonus won't change my practise one iota - I expect a fair salary for my work, but I own the input of many people into the success of students.

  • Arbee25 from Jerrabomberra , NSW Saturday, 28 August 2010, 10:28

    New schools, primary or secondary, are not going to be of any use if they do not have teachers. There are so many better paid jobs for people with four year degrees and it is already very difficult to attract teachers, particularly in specialised high school areas, but also in early childhood and primary school. I'm still earning less as a teacher (on the top classroom salary) than I was earning in the public service 11 years ago. Luckily I love the job. Fair salaries for an increasingly difficult job is a reasonable request. I totally support mel7610's call for smaller classes (as do the teacher's union), and for better funding - but better schools will only happen with appropriate funding and with better salaries for teachers so we can actually attract great teachers into the system. Would you want to deal with the public criticism, the chronic shortages of resources, large class sizes and fixing the nations social ills for a salary where two average teachers earning, combined, are less than the national household average income? That said - what happened to Labor's 'Kevin07' campaign promise of a better deal for government schools, in fact making them a focus of government spending and policy? Trashed for the promise of votes, while government schools, arguably the underpinning of our egalitarian society, are leached of all students but the most disadvantaged as people choose the unfairly advantaged private system. And our government schools, left to deal with the ills of society, are then pilloried because of poor results. I'd love Ms Gillard to come and spend a day at our school to see what happens, and tell us how we can improve academic outcomes when our kids are hungry (thank heavens for charities like OzHarvest who provide food for them), don't have books because their parents can't provide them, and only have pencils and textas because the teachers buy them out of their own money. Even the local Labor MP has only ever attended to open the BER work recently completed. If you don't look you can't see, so you can continue to pretend it's not broken!

  • hurtling from North Perth , WA Thursday, 19 August 2010, 21:19

    a Ranga... or a Wingnut. An acute intelligence... or an athletic immaturity. A proven negiator... or a pious naysayer. A national curriculum or a curriculum for nationalists. Nurture... or negativity. Tried... or try hard. A Julia... or a joke. A Gillard... or a gimmick. The choice is clear.

  • mel7610 from albany , western australia Thursday, 19 August 2010, 19:19

    well good to know only one full day left before THE day! I just hope Mr. Crean You listen to the public pleas not to pay the teachers anymore and put that money toward new schools (primary and secondary),our kids are being neglected and left to struggle in the huge classes needing to provide for the population boost.Once this is sorted out then perhaps look to "Acknowledge Excellence".If you really want skilled workers this is the place to start for the not to distant future.