Labor Blog

    Tackling the homelessness crisis

    Robert McClelland posted Friday, 3 February 2012

    Homelessness is a serious issue for Australia.  Short of finding good employment, putting a roof over your head is the most important issue for working families. 
     
    As a relatively wealthy and prosperous nation, it seems unfathomable that we have an estimated 105,000 Australians who are experiencing homelessness – and as a Labor Government we need to do more for these Australians, and for those at risk of homelessness.
     
    This Labor Government is working with all levels of government, business, charities and the community to reduce homelessness in Australia through our $1.1 billion National Partnership Agreement on Homelessness.
     
    This week’s Report on Government Services 2012 shows that our investments are making progress in tackling the huge task of putting a roof over the heads of our community’s most vulnerable.
     
    On 5 January this year I announced that 17,000 new homes have already been delivered under our $5.6 billion Social Housing Initiative, well on target to meet our promise of 19,600 homes this year. It’s the single social housing largest investment ever by any Australian Government.
     
    In the last few weeks I’ve been moved and inspired by the dedication of those who work in Specialist Homeless Services, and by the spirit of those who need their assistance.


    I helped serve lunch in a men’s crisis centre in Newcastle with local member Sharon Grierson. I spoke to teenaged tenants at the Youth Care youth refuge in Hervey Bay, Queensland, about the second chance such facilities give them. And the Member for Richmond, Justine Elliot, invited me to see first hand how providers in Byron Bay are banding together in a network to refer vulnerable people to the right help at the right time.


    Let’s remember to support our dedicated local Specialist Homeless Services whenever we can. The work that they do is essential.








     

    Tags: Homelessness

28 Comments

  • GNCORP from melbourne , victoria Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:04

    Good idea ALP, we should not have homelessness in Australia. Why allow refuges and give high welfare payments and benefits while our own citizens live on the streets with nothing. Take care of our own first!

  • Sauman from Salt Lake City , West Bengal Saturday, 4 February 2012, 14:04

    Z:agree Big Concept.Calling Australia Home and Being Homeless.As C points out.Identification and Inclusion of "it".Not as just a mere "Volunteer".Creative Community Care Solution.What about Cave issues:).Defining "Volunteer" and Tier.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    Just a little nudge in a solution direction to bundle up housing, jobs going overseas, debt going to stuff the joint up, more populations good but then more population is bad, 457's - all in "Basel III Australian Development Zones"!

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    You could play with 457 visas in the zone.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    They could also be a special gazetted awards zone where minimum rates of pay were determined by reference to standard living costs [you want lower wage costs then reduce the cost of living in the zone.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    The special rating would only be available in particular area, like one a good spot for a new city on the Tim Fisher Fast Rail line, or one of those new cities Warren Mundine sees up north.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    The Australian Government would guarantee any debt funding secured by banks to feed the pool.

    The standard price limits would rise from 1 to 2 bedroom, ad from 2 to 3 bedroom etc.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    What about a Basel 111 [Australian] Risk Weighted Asset class with a Risk Weighting of 0 for loans where newly built property sale prices are below a ratio linked to some kind of average per person income measure.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Saturday, 4 February 2012, 13:04

    It's a big scale concept - I accept.

    So lets give it a productive inclusive focal point.

    Debt, Mining V Else, Jobs, Housing ....

    What about this ...

  • chris1948 from Melbourne , VIC Saturday, 4 February 2012, 03:04

    So what about this.

    Notice an underlying thread in a lot of these pieces?
    Australia your country needs you.
    For nothing, as a volunteer.
    Whilst an attack of the warm fuzzies presents plenty of pics its not the solution.
    The 2nd para says it

  • Joseph3 from Nedlands , W.A Friday, 3 February 2012, 18:03

    Great policy but unless the leadership issue is sorted out pronto-it will all come to nought.
    Understand MPs are meeting Sunday- a unanimious vote of confidencet in the PM, including that of the Kevin Rudd camp would be good-otherwise a spill!!

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 15:03

    Step 3 is to use immigration to grow the economy into new development areas in ways that drives down cost of living. With regards housing this means allowing banks to recapitalize based on a larger volume of new housing loans at lower loan value.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 15:03

    Step 2 is to work on systems that supply the basics. For example, clearly we need new cities, greenfield cities, to reduce the cost of living. This is the hedge against the trend of production finding lower labour costs.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 15:03

    Step 1 is to absolutely and irrevocably lock up areas of the country as wilderness and natural areas. Maybe put it in a referendum, having first looked at what areas are needed for what development like Tim Fishers very fast trains and so on.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 15:03

    What about this:

    We have one last ramp of the population and property development lever, but only if it comes with absolute limits that deliver on my peoples at the least respect for the land and the natural environment.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    So, what takes that and steps forwards into it alongside everything that is happening?

  • public Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    So there we have it. There is no point walking away from it, pretending it is different, benching any long terms strategy for the country at something we kid ourselves can enable us to overlook the basic reality.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    If we take the time honored 30% of household income for housing as the benchmark, then if our single person funds the dwelling then at 8% for 40 years then it's "price" needs to be $87,000.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    If we borrow our calculated public housing cost of $354,100 at 8% the repayment over 40 years [a working life] say for the sake of the exercise is $29,545 a year.

    That's well over the benchmark income.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    And to get our bearings why not start with that single taxable income and put ourselves alone in a dwelling heading off to a job.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    But it doesn't mean pulling up stumps, packing everything in the shed, and heading inside with the blinds drawn.

    There are opportunities here.

    We just need to do it smart. Think it through. And step into it.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 14:03

    Therefore, we need to aim at numbers fundamentally make sense. In a practical Australian way. In a Tim Fisher or Dick Smith kind of way.

    If you want the fear - well there is a storm a brewing there is nothing surer - and we need to set the sails.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 13:03

    We are all familiar with the problem in house prices?

    Because they are such a major part of the non-discretional spending of a household they only way they can be funded directly in the real economy is by wage increases.

    Jobs go offshore.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 13:03

    Mining: $1753 per person.

    Mining Projects In the Pipeline - lets say $500 billion. 22,820,947 population.

    If there is an 8% return on that $500 billion we are talking a return of $1753 per person.

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 13:03

    Housing Cost per Dwelling Public Housing: $354,100

    Lets capitalize one years non recurring and determine what capitol amount would be serviced by $28,328 [28328/0.08 = 354100]

    http://www.pc.gov.au/gsp/reports/rogs/2012 [p 115 Table 16A.16 2010-

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 13:03

    Taxable Income Per Person: $24,285

    http://www.ato.gov.au/content/downloads/cor00268761_2009TAXSTATS.pdf [Page 10]

    "individuals had taxable income of $554.2 billion"

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 13:03

    Population of Australia: 22,820,947

    http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/0/1647509ef7e25faaca2568a900154b63?OpenDocument

  • zedlive from Tamworth , NSW Friday, 3 February 2012, 13:03

    Nice.

    There is still a lot of work to do.

    Lets burrow in at housing and see where we come out.